Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?

Triggering something known locally (interface down etc)
needs an external trigger. Lack of packets could be triggered
either by external triggers or MOBIKE/IKEv2 itself. I
personally prefer the latter, because there would be
less reliance on APIs and other protocol layers.

--Jari

Mohan Parthasarathy wrote:
> Are we assuming that triggers for these are going to come from outside of mobike or
> mobike itself will detect such things ?
> 
> -mohan
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:01 AM
> Subject: [Mobike] New issue 16: No packets from other end?
> 
> 
> I've created a new issue in the issue list:
> 
>    "Can the protocol recover from situations where the only 
>    sign of problems is lack of packets from the other end?"
> 
>    (http://www.vpnc.org/ietf-mobike/issues.html)
> 
> Many people at the WG meeting expressed opinions that this 
> should be handled somehow (in addition to handling e.g. 
> link-down triggers from layer 2, or something similar).
> 
> So far, I do not remember anyone saying that the protocol
> does not need to handle this situation. But comments
> are welcome.
> 
> Best regards,
> Pasi
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
> 
>