Re: Some thoughts about "path failover"
"Spencer Dawkins" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <01dc01c423a4$cab6e8d0$0300a8c0@DFNJGL21> |
> > - Initiator sends the previous IKEv2 request (not a new one, > > to avoid problems with window size) over all the paths. I know the Internet has changed a bit since Slow Start was introduced :-} but my impression was that if you think you have a problem, sending multiple packets into the network is not the right thing to so. You're talking about sending single packets over multiple paths, but we don't know how disjoint the paths are (so they may all traverse one link somewhere on the way). Should we ignore this, or think about it? Pasi, do you have a sense that we're talking about a recovery mechanism that we use during Fast Recovery, or during RTO (to put things in TCP-speak)? Spencer