Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?

Vijay Devarapalli <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]>
what is "lack of ESP packets"? for how long do you wait?

isnt this dependent on the application?

do you want to trigger an IKEv2 informational request everytime
the application "pauses"?

MOBIKE shouldnt decide. I agree with Francis, that the "lack
of ESP packets" should be handled elsewhere in the stack (and
not in MOBIKE).

Vijay

Tero Kivinen wrote:
> [email protected] writes:
> 
>>Do you mean that lack of ESP packets would trigger an IKEv2
>>informational request and lack of response to that would trigger 
>>MOBIKE to change paths, or that lack of ESP packets
>>would directly trigger MOBIKE to change paths?
> 
> 
> The first. I.e. we need to still do the dead peer detection to verify
> if it just so that the other end is simply silent.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.