Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?
Vijay Devarapalli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
what is "lack of ESP packets"? for how long do you wait? isnt this dependent on the application? do you want to trigger an IKEv2 informational request everytime the application "pauses"? MOBIKE shouldnt decide. I agree with Francis, that the "lack of ESP packets" should be handled elsewhere in the stack (and not in MOBIKE). Vijay Tero Kivinen wrote: > [email protected] writes: > >>Do you mean that lack of ESP packets would trigger an IKEv2 >>informational request and lack of response to that would trigger >>MOBIKE to change paths, or that lack of ESP packets >>would directly trigger MOBIKE to change paths? > > > The first. I.e. we need to still do the dead peer detection to verify > if it just so that the other end is simply silent.