Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?
Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In your previous mail you wrote: Seems like most people want to rely on some sort of standard movement detection process outside MOBIKE (= the local knowledge). => = what I called "generic mobility/multi-homing control". Question: how are we going to specify this, just as an assumption that its outside the MOBIKE protocol, or as a hard requirement to do <something>? => clearly outside. It seems that the former is the only option, given that movement detection is somewhat of a moving target (no pun intended). IPv4 and IPv6 have different capabilities, several enhancements are being worked in different places (MIP6/DHCP/DNA WGs), etc. => we should also consider multi-homing which is not so easy... At least for mobility we have some practice (:-)! Thanks [email protected]