Re: New issue 17: Full connectivity
Stephen Kent <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06110402bd63953869a2@[128.89.89.75]> |
At 12:27 PM -0700 9/6/04, Srinivasa Rao Addepalli wrote: >Umm... I guess it depends on how IPSec is implemented. > >At the originitaing security gateway must know the remote peer IP >address and uses >it as Destination IP address. right. >On the receiving end, some implementations would only check if the destination >IP address of the received packet is its local IP address. If so, it >consumes the >packet and if not, the packet is forwarded. Some implementation >might go beyond >this and might even look for exact match. If the destination is a security gateway, it must distinguish between IPsec traffic addressed to it and IPsec (or non-IPsec) traffic addressed to hosts behind it, and thus potentially bypassed. So, in that context, it is necessary to pay attention to the destination address! Steve