RE: transport mode document as WG item

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <DC504E9C3384054C8506D3E6BB012460010001A2@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
Hi Francis,

Yes. I agree that an implication of handling the transport case would
be a more integrated MOBIKE (with IPsec Architecture). 

Best Regards,
Atul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 6:00 PM
> To: Sharma Atul (Nokia-ES/Boston)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Mobike] transport mode document as WG item 
> 
>    case. So, thinking out loud, as far as MOBIKE is concerned 
> the mechanism
>    should be similar whether we are using tunnel or transport mode?
>    
> => no, changing an address in transport mode implies far more than
> in tunnel mode: MOBIKE must be integrated into the whole 
> IPsec architecture.
> We can specify something specific for transport mode, my 
> proposal is to
> put transport mode outside the scope of MOBIKE for the moment.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.