RE: transport mode document as WG item
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DC504E9C3384054C8506D3E6BB012460010001A2@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com> |
Hi Francis, Yes. I agree that an implication of handling the transport case would be a more integrated MOBIKE (with IPsec Architecture). Best Regards, Atul > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 6:00 PM > To: Sharma Atul (Nokia-ES/Boston) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Mobike] transport mode document as WG item > > case. So, thinking out loud, as far as MOBIKE is concerned > the mechanism > should be similar whether we are using tunnel or transport mode? > > => no, changing an address in transport mode implies far more than > in tunnel mode: MOBIKE must be integrated into the whole > IPsec architecture. > We can specify something specific for transport mode, my > proposal is to > put transport mode outside the scope of MOBIKE for the moment. >