Re: Some definitions (Was: Re: New issue 16: No packets fromother end?)
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Kempf wrote: > ----- > 4. Primary Address Pair > >> Contrary to SCTP which has a specific congestion avoidance design >> suitable for multi-homing, IP-layer solutions need to avoid sending >> packets concurrently over multiple paths; TCP behaves rather poorly >> in such circumstances. For this reason it is necessary to choose a >> particular pair of addresses as the primary address pair which is >> used until problems occur, at least for the same session. >> > > > Actually, SCTP doesn't send packets over multiple paths either. It uses the > addresses only for failover, that is when it detects a failure, it switches > to another address. Yes, I think you are right about the usage of just one path at a time. Question: does SCTP still have some specific congestion avoidance for multi-homing, such as going back to slow start upon changing to a different path? --Jari