Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Francis, > I think MOBIKE should get use and try to get as much information from > outside as possible, but in the end it still needs to test the > possible address pairs by itself to get positive feedback that the > address pair works. > > => this is (check the address pair works) the job of the IPsec module, > not MOBIKE, at the exception of primary peer addresses for IKE messages. Let me try to understand this statement better. Are you saying that testing an address pair is the job of the ESP/AH module, or that it belongs to the IKEv2 functionality already specified (even without MOBIKE extension)? I think you must mean the latter. Here's why: the current IKEv2 approach to this appears to be DPD, which works through IKEv2 messages, right? Or am I missing something? (Certainly the lack of ESP packets might be a HINT that something is wrong, but you wouldn't know if it was due to lack of need to send packets until you try with DPD.) --Jari