Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Francis Dupont wrote: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > I agree that while the IP stack (MIP6 or multi6) can determine > if there is a pair of addresses that the IP stack can use, we > still need an IKE message to figure out if the IKE endpoints > have a pair of addresses that they can use. and if the IP > stack (or a policy on the mobile node) tells MOBIKE to use a > particular address, that address should be tried first always. > > => can you define "MOBIKE to use a particular address"? I think that when Vijay said "MOBIKE" he meant the system composed of IPsec, IKEv2, and MOBIKE. Essentially, its the IKEv2 messages and IPsec AH/ESP packets that need to use an address. There may be some MOBIKE control messages too, but those are carried on top of IKEv2. And MOBIKE exists for the reason that it should help IKEv2 and IPsec traffic to go to the right address. --Jari