Re: possibly related draft

Greg Daley wrote:

> At this stage there's no work done within DNA WG on APIs but we're
> looking at getting indications of local connectivity from L2 into L3
> within DNA WG.
> Similar work has been going on with DNAv4 in DHC.
> 
> I'd guess that once the DNA system is able to indicate that an IP
> configuration (addresses,local routers) is invalidated, or had
> a connection discontinuity (e.g. link-layer only base station change)
> This information could be passed to the upper layer protocols or IP
> subsystems, in a similar fashion to a subset of the trigtran work
> (but with only adjacent layer violations).
> 
> Hysteresis and security of the change discovery would probably exist
> within the DNA subsystem, but information about trust could be
> passed around too.  I'm not proposing this as a work item for DNA,
> but it's intertesting for that group to see what people are really
> interested in.
> 
> Please tell me if this is the right path to look down for local
> connectivity indications (or not).

I think it is.

--Jari