issue 6: scope of SA changes

Jari Arkko writes:
> 1. Would it be useful to treat different flows or applications
>     in a different manner with regards to their multihoming
>     behaviour? For instance, keep one flow always in GPRS
>     but allow another flow to use LAN where available.
> 
>     Yes, optional  [X]

I think it is usefull feature on some scenarios, but it is not needed
at all by others, so it needs to be optional. 

> 2. Would you like to provide this functionality through
> 
>     Separate IKE SAs and their independent addresses     [X]

Separate IKE SA would be fine, i.e. I do not think this so important
issue that we need to add fine granularity to the SA movement. 
-- 
[email protected]