RE: issue 6: scope of SA changes

> 
> 1. Would it be useful to treat different flows or applications
>     in a different manner with regards to their multihoming
>     behaviour? For instance, keep one flow always in GPRS
>     but allow another flow to use LAN where available.
> 
>     Yes, mandatory [ ]
>     Yes, optional  [ ]
>     No             [X]
> 

I do not see this that usefull compared to extra complexity.
Maybe later on when there is better use case for it.

Mika