Re: issue 6: scope of SA changes
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think we have consensus on this. Some of us see a possible need for an optional mechanism that is capable of treating some flows in different manner than others. But it appears that IKE SA based mechanisms are sufficient, i.e., no need to build specific IPsec SA treatment into the protocol. Pasi, you can update the issue list regarding #6. --Jari