Re: New issue 16: No packets from other end?

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   Francis Dupont wrote:
   >  In your previous mail you wrote:
   > 
   >    I agree that while the IP stack (MIP6 or multi6) can determine
   >    if there is a pair of addresses that the IP stack can use, we
   >    still need an IKE message to figure out if the IKE endpoints
   >    have a pair of addresses that they can use. and if the IP
   >    stack (or a policy on the mobile node) tells MOBIKE to use a
   >    particular address, that address should be tried first always.
   >    
   > => can you define "MOBIKE to use a particular address"?
   
   I think that when Vijay said "MOBIKE" he meant the system
   composed of IPsec, IKEv2, and MOBIKE. Essentially, its
   the IKEv2 messages and IPsec AH/ESP packets that need to
   use an address. There may be some MOBIKE control messages
   too, but those are carried on top of IKEv2. And MOBIKE
   exists for the reason that it should help IKEv2 and IPsec
   traffic to go to the right address.
   
=> so you have two different usages: the IPsec one (which is
important because the provided service is IPsec) and the IKEv2
one (MOBIUKE is "embedded" into IKEv2). The second is already
handled by the DPD of IKEv2.

Regards

[email protected]