Re: issue 12: interaction with other protocols doing RR

Vijay,

> I would rather add an RR test to Mobile IP. It could be a
> simple Mobility Header message probe protected by IPsec.
> a couple of reasons.

I've no objection to this, it might even be a better solution.

> 1. I am not sure we are going to be using MOBIKE between
>     a MN and HA (when they are already doing Mobile IPv6
>     signaling. BU is your MOBIKE update message).
> 2. no need to have some kind of interaction between the
>     IKE stack and the Mobile IPv6 stack
>

I think it would be useful to compare the two solutions.

I have not read your IKEv2 for MIP draft, but I am interested to know if
some of the backdoor API changes in IPsec mentioned in RFC 3776 could be
removed if the HA and MN support MOBIKE. Do you think this would be
possible?

            jak