Re: issue 12: interaction with other protocols doing RR

Francis Dupont <[email protected]> Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:32:09 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   I would rather add an RR test to Mobile IP.

=> I don't understand this necessity to even more damage Mobile IPv6.
Perhaps it is not yet in trouble?

   It could be a
   simple Mobility Header message probe protected by IPsec.

=> it simply costs a RTT for a second order threat.

   a couple of reasons.
   1. I am not sure we are going to be using MOBIKE between
       a MN and HA (when they are already doing Mobile IPv6
       signaling. BU is your MOBIKE update message).

=> we are going to use either MOBIKE between a mobile VPN client
and SG, or Mobile IPv6 between a MN and HA.

   2. no need to have some kind of interaction between the
       IKE stack and the Mobile IPv6 stack
   
=> and the K flag?

Regards

[email protected]