Mobile IP and Mobike

So nobody's come out and spoken directly to the issue, but there's been lots
of talk around the edges. Here's my interpretation of what the interaction
of Mobile IP and Mobike is.

>From the discussion on the list and at the meeting this week, it sounds like
Mobike and Mobile IP are separate and incompatible solutions to mobility,
with orthogonal deployment scenerios. They are incompatible because
deploying them together on the same box would result in duplicate "binding
update" messages between the host and the tunnel endpoint (which is the home
agent in Mobile IP). From this, I deduce that having both in a host stack at
the same time is to be discouraged. Their deployment scenerios are
orthogonal because Mobile IP is targetted at wireless network service
providers and Mobike is targeted more at enterprise customers with road
warriors. There might be some overlap for cases such as UMA, which is using
IPsec tunnels set up using IKEv2 over WLAN to tunnel gateways through which
circuit-switched GSM voice traffic and GSM signaling is directed, in
addition to GPRS traffic. The UMA gateways are presumably in a wireless
network operator's network.

Am I missing something? Is more detailed analysis necessary to confirm this
admittedly superficial description? Fire away!

            jak