Re: issue 5: zero address set

Francis Dupont wrote:
> I don't believe zero address set support is so useful but I have
> a little concern about it: when a node has really no available
> addresses I prefer its peer knows this in place of just
> keep the last usable address and suggest it does still work...
> Of course, this situation should be temporary.

Right. I have a sense that we have difficulties to
avoid temporary disconnects no matter what we do...
often in wireless we don't get to choose whether we
tell the other nodes that we are going to switch or
go out of coverage; we get a problem and the protocols
have to live with that.

--Jari