Re: issue 4: how to signal support for MOBIKE
"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Tero.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tero Kivinen" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: "MOBIKE Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 2:40 AM
Subject: [Mobike] issue 4: how to signal support for MOBIKE
> Jari Arkko writes:
> > So I would suggest that we use the Vendor ID approach.
>
> I would suggest NOTIFY approach. I.e we send notify saying
> MOBIKE_SUPPORTED and thats it. Similar thatn what is done for the
> NAT-T or the IPCOMP_SUPPORTED or USE_TRANSPORT_MODE etc.
>
> In most cases we do not want to fail the negotiation even if the other
> end does not support MOBIKE, we simply revert back to redoing the
> authentication every time IP-addresses changes.
>
> If our final protocol is going to use notifies to send the
> IP-addresses, then we can use those notifies to signal the use of
> MOBIKE instead of separate MOBIKE_SUPPORTED notify.
> --
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
>