Re: issue #16
Joe Touch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tschofenig Hannes wrote: | hi all, | | i guess we can close issue # 16: | "Can the protocol recover from situations where the only sign of problems is | lack of packets from the other end?" | http://www.vpnc.org/ietf-mobike/issue16.txt Internet paths that are silent aren't problems, IMO. They're just idle network paths. This sounds like a job for a link layer, and I don't think mobike needs to be a link layer. Joe | as a conclusion of the discussions we said: | | - mobike defines a mechanism to test connectivity along paths. | - both peers might use input from other sources to detect a failure (e.g., a | local link failure) | - based on this information mobike might decide to switch to a new address | (if available). | | ciao | hannes | _______________________________________________ | Mobike mailing list | [email protected] | https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBuNezE5f5cImnZrsRAlRKAJ45hue31XWR2Gklfxm13vDYtHVX1QCfU86E SmA7ZmLlf47460z4d07E/OA= =KIh/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----