Re: Re: Lack of packets from other end
Bill Sommerfeld <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 00:07, Bora Akyol wrote: > I agree with Joe here. There are legitimate situations where there may > be no packets from the other end for a long period of time. We have DPD > to detect a dead peer. If a peer moves from one IP addr to another > without notifying the security gateway, I don't think it is the SG's job > to detect and recover from this. this is an somewhat akin to path mtu blackhole detection; inter-layer side channels could well allow an upper-layers repeated RTO to trigger a hunt for a better path. it's not the sort of thing which will be as immediately effective as a link-down indication from L2 but it's not something that we should explicitly declare out of spec. - Bill