Re: issue #16
Joe Touch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tschofenig Hannes wrote: > hi all, > > maybe we get a little bit lost on this particular issue. what are we > discussing here? here is my short summary: ... > btw, we are not the first discussing this area. there has been a lot of work > in the context of sctp on this issue. i have the impression that they have > the same view on it. That is not necessarily a good thing. Multi6 decided to avoid encouraging higher layers handling multihoming for several reasons: - need to reinvent the wheel for every layer above network - interactions between network layer solutions and upper layer solutions It would be useful to at least review their progress on this issue. Joe _______________________________________________ Mobike mailing list [email protected] https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 254 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFByFwOE5f5cImnZrsRAtPrAJ0ZLiWQJMnjTKbo1jBnMo1szrk61gCg68PK qMiFy3nfOCkvzRbC5aKbfV4= =Gl1P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----