RE: issue 3: nat traversal
Paul Hoffman / VPNC <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06200710bdee72e79924@[10.20.30.249]> |
At 6:50 PM -0500 12/21/04, Bill Sommerfeld wrote: >In the meantime, I wonder if we could get any leverage out of a "NAT expected" >bit -- carried in a secured part of the protocol. This would need to be >administratively configured. It would probably have to default to "on". How would an administrator know how to set that bit? Is the expectation they would do so by testing first? --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium