RE: Re: Lack of packets from other end
Bill Sommerfeld <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1103686600.7998.206.camel@thunk> |
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 22:24, Bora Akyol wrote: > We may need some > logic to do Make-before-break type switch like is common on cell phone > networks. that's the entire point of attaching sctp-like multiple addresses to IKE and IPsec SA's. anyhow, to respond to an earlier question of yours: - if the SG's peer has given us multiple addresses - and the SG is also a stateful firewall of some sort then it should be capable of noticing that traffic to the peer *should* have provoked a response (e.g., any non-pure-ACK TCP segment) but *didn't*. if the SG is not acting as a stateful firewall I wouldn't expect it to do this sort of thing. decouple the source of the hints that all is not well from the action taken when you notice all is not well, and leave which hints to use open-ended for now..