Re: issue 16, recovering from problems that show just a lack of packets

Jari Arkko wrote:
> 
> Joe, Hannes,
> 
> We had a lengthy discussion about this in December. Here's what
> I think the conclusion was:
> 
> o  MOBIKE can be affected by multiple sources of information,
>    both local (L2 tells it no longer is connected) and path-related
>    (DPD tells that we have a problem).
> 
> o Retrying with new addresses (src and dst) is OK under such
>   problem situations. Recommend leaving specific address
>   selection to lower layers in the stack, e.g., unspecifed source
>   address when using API to IP.
> 
> o Potential interference with dynamic routing protocols needs
>   to be noted & documented.
> 
> --Jari

That all seems reasonable to me.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Mobike mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCMQYME5f5cImnZrsRAtISAJ9hn+41YGebrns4+COesUzFwG2XyQCg7IVH
QTtfYyO5D64zgIea22wpr7E=
=1dep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----