RE: issue 11 -- window size

Hm...interesting.  I still think it's reasonable to expect a window size >
1.

-g 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Sommerfeld [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:08 PM
> To: Geoffrey Huang
> Cc: [email protected]; 'Jari Arkko'; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Mobike] issue 11 -- window size
> 
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:46, Geoffrey Huang wrote:
> > I agree.  I think it's reasonable to expect a window size > 1.
> 
> the issue is a bit more subtle than that: if mobike mobility 
> requests (of whatever form) occupy ike request sequence 
> space, then in order to avoid deadlocking during a move while 
> there are other outstanding requests, mobike implementations 
> will need to reserve at least the "last" request window slot 
> for those requests at all times, effectively reducing the 
> window at all other times by at least one request.
> 
> 
> 
>