Re: issues 18, 15, 6 -- return routability

Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Vijay Devarapalli wrote:

>>
>>  - Do the tests if configuration tells you to
>
>
> the configuration could be in many different ways, right? for
> example, even if the configuration on a VPN gateway is to
> perform the test, the configuration could further say, perform
> the text only when the traffic to a particular address exceeds
> a certain volume? basically I see the configuration as internal
> to the node. It could say
>   - just perform the test for everyone, everytime
>   - exclude this list of nodes for return routability tests
>   - perform the test if the traffic exceeds a certain volume
>   - and so on....
>
> do we want all of the above to be allowed, or just a simple
> perform the test/don't perform the test?

Yes. I guess what we are saying that you must at least
have an on/off config knob... but a particular implementation
could have a fancier scheme. I agree that its largely
internal, and hard to standarize what the "fancier" stuff
is.

>>  - If the specific IP address can be found in the peer's certificate, 
>> you can skip the test
>
>
> how do dynamic addresses get into the certificate? I think
> I missed the discussion. maybe, I should look in the archives.
>
They don't. You could only do this between stationary gateways.

--Jari
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.