Re: issues 18, 15, 6 -- return routability
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vijay Devarapalli wrote: >> >> - Do the tests if configuration tells you to > > > the configuration could be in many different ways, right? for > example, even if the configuration on a VPN gateway is to > perform the test, the configuration could further say, perform > the text only when the traffic to a particular address exceeds > a certain volume? basically I see the configuration as internal > to the node. It could say > - just perform the test for everyone, everytime > - exclude this list of nodes for return routability tests > - perform the test if the traffic exceeds a certain volume > - and so on.... > > do we want all of the above to be allowed, or just a simple > perform the test/don't perform the test? Yes. I guess what we are saying that you must at least have an on/off config knob... but a particular implementation could have a fancier scheme. I agree that its largely internal, and hard to standarize what the "fancier" stuff is. >> - If the specific IP address can be found in the peer's certificate, >> you can skip the test > > > how do dynamic addresses get into the certificate? I think > I missed the discussion. maybe, I should look in the archives. > They don't. You could only do this between stationary gateways. --Jari