RE: issue 11 -- window size

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:44 AM
> To: Geoffrey Huang; 'Bill Sommerfeld'; 'Jari Arkko'
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Mobike] issue 11 -- window size
> 
> At 9:51 PM -0800 3/30/05, Geoffrey Huang wrote:
> >So it needs to
> >split this between "regular" IKE messages and MOBIKE messages?
> 
> Not "split", but "allow enough extra for MOBIKE".
> 
> >I prefer your earlier suggestion of reserving one or two message IDs 
> >from the window for mobility purposes.  Consider a roaming 
> client that 
> >gets a notify from a security gateway (SGW) saying the SGW's window 
> >size is 5.  The client should know that it's capable of mobility and 
> >consequently reserve a message ID for MOBIKE messages.  Just 
> because a 
> >peer sends a notification about a window size doesn't mean that an 
> >implementation needs to fill up the window.
> 
> That sounds good. The question is: how many should we suggest 
> to reserve?

Wouldn't one be sufficient for the address update notification?

-g

> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
>