RE: issue 11 -- window size

"Stephane Beaulieu" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Is there really a point of reserving.  I mean, what's the peer going to do
if you exceed the window? (other than complain you're violating the RFC :).
The peer will silently drop it until it's finished with another one, right.
So what !  I can just keep transmitting my mobike message(s) until the peer
has a chance to process it and respond, right?

Stephane.

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:44 AM
> To: Geoffrey Huang; 'Bill Sommerfeld'; 'Jari Arkko'
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Mobike] issue 11 -- window size
> 
> At 9:51 PM -0800 3/30/05, Geoffrey Huang wrote:
> >So it needs to
> >split this between "regular" IKE messages and MOBIKE messages?
> 
> Not "split", but "allow enough extra for MOBIKE".
> 
> >I prefer your earlier suggestion of reserving one or two message IDs 
> >from the window for mobility purposes.  Consider a roaming 
> client that 
> >gets a notify from a security gateway (SGW) saying the SGW's window 
> >size is 5.  The client should know that it's capable of mobility and 
> >consequently reserve a message ID for MOBIKE messages.  Just 
> because a 
> >peer sends a notification about a window size doesn't mean that an 
> >implementation needs to fill up the window.
> 
> That sounds good. The question is: how many should we suggest 
> to reserve?
> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.