RE: [WARNING: A/V UNSCANNABLE] RE: issue 11 -- window size

"Stephane Beaulieu" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sorry, I didn't notice your other post until I sent this.  Your follow up
post answers my questions.

> 
> Hi Tero,
> 
> > 
> > There is also one other option, i.e. the way my original protocol 
> > proposal did it, i.e. every IKE packet can be used to test 
> the paths.
> > If you add also so that every IKE packet also includes the 
> information 
> > needed to do mobility that solves the problem with window size 1.
> > 
> > I.e. if mobike needs n payload for its processing, you add those n 
> > payloads to all IKE packets, and then when you are 
> retransmitting the 
> > IKE packet you simply also use that packet to do path finding, i.e.
> > change the source and destination addresses but keep the 
> packet same.
> > The responder will reply to reversed addresses, and after that IKE 
> > exchange both ends know that the path has changed, and can take 
> > appropriate actions (either automatically or manually by sending 
> > another exchange).
> 
> So, if you have two peers
> 
> PeerA(A1,A2) PeerB(B1,B2) which are using A1<->B1 for the 
> initial connection.
> 
> Given the following sequence of events
> - Window Size = 1
> 
> A1 --> B1 (CREATE_CHILD_SA request)
> Interface A1 goes down
> A1 x-- B1 (CREATE_CHILD_SA response)
> 
> How would PeerA inform PeerB to start using A2?  It is unable 
> to send any IKE pkts at all without exceeding the window 
> size.  Or are you relying on PeerB to retransmit the response 
> to A1 a few times, and then automatically switch to A2?
> 
> Stephane.
> 
> > 
> > That protocol will work with window size of 1, and it does not need 
> > any packets that are outside of the normal window processing. If we 
> > still do manual actions, then we actually do not need any special 
> > payloads in the IKE packets.
> > --
> > [email protected]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mobike mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.