Re: issue 11 -- window size

Hello folks,

We have had a lively discussion about this on the list.
We started by listing a couple of alternatives including
doing certain MOBIKE messages outside the window,
and requiring larger than 1 window sizes. Tero brought up
his proposal (see [1] and clarifications e.g. in [2]) which
can work under window size 1 while still fitting within
the regular IKEv2 message processing. Some discussion
was held on exactly how this can be integrated to NAT
traversal and potential future extensions.

My sense was that there were at least some persons who
felt that Tero's approach is good enough. I think Mohan
was the only one who had question marks
about this, e.g., why pick it over others and how well it
works with NATs. How do others who have not voiced
an opinion yet feel? Are there serious issues with Tero's
proposal? If not, we could just do what Tero proposed.

--Jari

[1] http://www.machshav.com/pipermail/mobike/2005-April/000730.html
[2] http://www.machshav.com/pipermail/mobike/2005-April/000752.html