RE: issue 11 -- window size

[email protected] writes:
> I think it is useful to allow path testing even when the current
> path is working, and the protocol should support doing this 
> without disrupting ongoing communication (which does not seem
> to be possible in your proposal).

It is possible, the protocol just needs to be written so it supports
it. If you want to get it working with IKEv2 NAT-T you need to add
modify the NAT-T behavior when using MOBIKE little more (You need to
modify the NAT-T behavior in all cases)

> (E.g., suppose we have two interfaces, one very fast and cheap, 
> second one very slow and expensive. If the first one has a temporary 
> problem, and we switch to the second one, we want to switch back 
> when possible even if the second interface keeps on working forever.)

Then you simply say that only N(MOVE TRAFFIC) is the only method of
updating the addresses. I.e. disable dynamic updating of IKEv2 NAT-T
(it is already allowed as dynamic update is SHOULD not MUST). 
-- 
[email protected]