AW: issue 19 -- same addresses for both directions?
"Tschofenig, Hannes" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ECDC9C7BC7809340842C0E7FCF48C3930CC79E@MCHP7IEA.ww002.siemens.net> |
hi jari, we should use the same addresses in both directions. this seems to be much easier (from a protocol point of view and regarding the traversal of nats/stateful packet filtering firewalls). ciao hannes > It looks to me that the decision on issue 20 (who decides) > is the main determining factor issue 19 as well. If issue > 20 resolution is that the initiator decides, then it more > or less follows that we have same addresses in both > directions. We can imagine different addresses even in > this case, but it does not appear to be very useful or > necessary. > > On the other hand, if we decide in 20 that the decisions > are independent, then it may in fact be very hard to > ensure that the two directions use the same addresses. > As a result, allowing different addresses would make > more sense in this scenario. > > My conclusion is that we should focus on trying to > solve issue 20 first. > > --Jari > > > _______________________________________________ > Mobike mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike >