AW: issue 19 -- same addresses for both directions?

"Tschofenig, Hannes" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <ECDC9C7BC7809340842C0E7FCF48C3930CC79E@MCHP7IEA.ww002.siemens.net>
hi jari,  

we should use the same addresses in both directions. 
this seems to be much easier (from a protocol point of view and
regarding the traversal of nats/stateful packet filtering firewalls).  

ciao
hannes
 

> It looks to me that the decision on issue 20 (who decides)
> is the main determining factor issue 19 as well. If issue
> 20 resolution is that the initiator decides, then it more
> or less follows that we have same addresses in both
> directions. We can imagine different addresses even in
> this case, but it does not appear to be very useful or
> necessary.
> 
> On the other hand, if we decide in 20 that the decisions
> are independent, then it may in fact be very hard to
> ensure that the two directions use the same addresses.
> As a result, allowing different addresses would make
> more sense in this scenario.
> 
> My conclusion is that we should focus on trying to
> solve issue 20 first.
> 
> --Jari
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mobike mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.machshav.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mobike
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.