Re: issues 18, 15, 6 -- return routability
Francis Dupont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In your previous mail you wrote: I think we came to agreement on when we can skip the test completely (by default, do the check; fancier authorization is possible but does not have to be standardized). But what about the before/after moving the traffic part? => my opinion is the optional RR check SHOULD be done before but the recommendation has to be relax (i.e., implementation choice) when the previous address is known to no more work: there is a trade-off between waiting for the RR check result and go immediately to the new and working path. Regards [email protected] PS: in an address set management framework, a no more working address is simply removed from the set.