Issue 24: NAT prevention details (was: Review of draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-00)
Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > that contain NATs. If the responder notices that a NAT is > present anyway, the request fails with error code NAT_PREVENTED. NAT_PREVENTED would say that you somehow managed to get rid of the NAT... If you can get that one working in a way, that it will actually remove the physical NAT, som people would be more than happy :-) > But maybe we could figure out better names for these payloads. > How about "NAT_PREVENTION_FAILURE" instead of "NAT_PREVENTED"? > It would perhaps tell more clearly that it's an error > indiciation? NAT_PREVENTION_FAILURE indicates that you failed to prevent nat... > Or NO_NAT_POLICY and NAT_POLICY_ERROR? Hmm... NO_NAT_BY_POLICY or something like that could be possible... but perhaps having word POLICY there is too dangerous... -- [email protected]