Issue 33: Changing ports 500/4500 and RR

Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:25:02 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

[email protected] writes:
> We don't need to change ports later if we move to a path that
> has a NAT (if we would change ports, we'd need to specify when
> exactly the changes happen and how, etc.). (I don't think
> wasting 4 bytes in IKE (not ESP) packets is a big problem...)

Hmm... True, it does make things a simplier in that case.
-- 
[email protected]