Re: Issue 24: NAT prevention details (was: Review of draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-00)
Bill Sommerfeld <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1121373679.207125.183.camel@thunk> |
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 04:25, Tero Kivinen wrote: > [email protected] writes: > > that contain NATs. If the responder notices that a NAT is > > present anyway, the request fails with error code NAT_PREVENTED. > > NAT_PREVENTED would say that you somehow managed to get rid of the > NAT... How about "NAT_DETECTED" or "UNEXPECTED_NAT_DETECTED" ? - Bill