Re: Issue: Should MOBIKE react to problems not known locally (#NEW)

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:28:20 +0300
Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do you mean that based on these "indirect" indications,
> MOBIKE would terminate the SAs? I think this is not necessary,
> normal IKEv2 mechanisms such as DPD will take care of it.

Exactly.

> However, the question is whether a MOBIKE node should
> attempt to use the peer's other address if one address
> seems not to work. (This would be in addition to using
> another address if the peer *told* you to use another
> address.)

Oh, yes, I think it should.