Re: issue 34 -- ESP vs. IKE based NAT reboot detection

Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

>Assume you're implementing both IKEv2 NAT traversal as well as mobike,
>with mobike use being optional.
>  
>
A likely case.

>Either alternative presumably needs a notification from ESP to key
>management that NAT-level "motion" has been detected, but alternative 3
>also seems to require a "mode bit" in ESP indicating when you should let
>ESP handle the address updates and when it should ignore them.
>  
>
Yes.

--Jari