Re: RE: issue 34 -- ESP vs. IKE based NAT reboot detection

Tero Kivinen wrote:

>Thats why I am saying alternate 3 is better, as it requires less
>changes or updates to the hardware.
>  
>
One could also support ESP-based updates on devices
that can do this, and say "this feature is not supported"
on others -- we are still talking about a corner case.
But people may have different opinions as to how
important support for this is under all circumstances.

--Jari