Re: Dormant Mode?

"James Kempf" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> my (somewhat dated, and admittedly limited) experience with demand-dial
> ppp connections leads me to believe that the definition of "gratuitous"
> is often highly user-specific and/or application-specific; if we go down
> this path, will we end up with nodes exchanging specially-marked
> selector sets describing the equivalent of the pppd "active-filter"?
>

Well, some kind of filter is a possibility, but I don't think it is 
necessary. The basic requirement, for any kind of Mobike support, is that 
the VPN gateway SA timeout is extended, on host request when it is about to 
go into dormant mode, so that the host isn't getting frequent keepalives.

> In any event, if we create an operating mode in which NAT keepalives are
> no longer sent, then that will, IMHO, be more-or-less equivalent to a
> no-address-mode scheme --- if you suspend NAT keepalives for longer than
> the NAT's idle-session-destruction timer, you'll essentially lose
> incoming connectivity to the side which is behind that NAT it reasserts
> its presence.
>

I don't see any way to fix the problem with NAT keepalives from the VPN 
side, because any keepalive sent to an address owned by the host will get 
delivered, thus waking it up, which is what you want to avoid. But I think 
it could help in a nonNAT situation.

            jak
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.