Re: Issue 36: unacceptable addresses (was: confirming consensus on issues from Paris)
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mobike |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: >Jari Arkko wrote: > > > >>Issue 36: Unacceptable addresses. There are cases where the >>initiator does not know which one of the retransmitted >>requests was really the one seen by the responder and resulted >>in the unacceptable address error. Pasi's solution for this is >>to send a new request in this (corner) case. >> >> > >(Back from vacation, and working on MOBIKE again...) > >I started editing the draft to make this change, but then >noticed the functionality is actually already there. Version >-01 says > > o If a new address change occurs while waiting for the > response, starts again from the first step (and ignores > responses to this UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES request). > >So in the ambiguous situation (UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES request has >been sent using several different src/dst addresses, and we >don't know which of them was unacceptable), it already says >we ignore the response and a new request is sent. > >(But I'll clarify this in -02; also the response is not really >totally ignored, just not processed by MOBIKE.) > > Works for me. --Jari