Re: Issue 36: unacceptable addresses (was: confirming consensus on issues from Paris)

Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:

>Jari Arkko wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Issue 36: Unacceptable addresses. There are cases where the
>>initiator does not know which one of the retransmitted
>>requests was really the one seen by the responder and resulted
>>in the unacceptable address error. Pasi's solution for this is
>>to send a new request in this (corner) case.
>>    
>>
>
>(Back from vacation, and working on MOBIKE again...)
>
>I started editing the draft to make this change, but then
>noticed the functionality is actually already there. Version
>-01 says
>
>   o  If a new address change occurs while waiting for the 
>      response, starts again from the first step (and ignores 
>      responses to this UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES request).
>
>So in the ambiguous situation (UPDATE_SA_ADDRESSES request has
>been sent using several different src/dst addresses, and we
>don't know which of them was unacceptable), it already says
>we ignore the response and a new request is sent.
>
>(But I'll clarify this in -02; also the response is not really
>totally ignored, just not processed by MOBIKE.)
>  
>
Works for me.

--Jari
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.