RE: RE: issue 34 -- ESP vs. IKE based NAT reboot detection

"Stephane Beaulieu (stephane)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <13E3DA8B48E17D4C96D261A36A23FCD685EC8C@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com>
Tero, Pasi,

Not really.

DPD's are only sent *if* one suspects that the peer is no longer
receiving pkts.  What we've seen in the real world is that in a span of
a 24 hour VPN RA connection, you'll probably only see about 20-100 DPD
messages (which are usually clustered in groups during high web-usage
times).

So, DPDs are not periodic.

Having said that, I don't see why probes would need to be periodic
either.  If you suspect the pkts aren't getting to your peer, then send
the DPD/mobike probe.  Otherwise, don't send anything.  If we can agree
on this, then I'm OK with probes.

Stephane.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tero Kivinen [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 9:08 AM
> To: Stephane Beaulieu (stephane)
> Cc: Jari Arkko; [email protected]; Mohan Parthasarathy; 
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Mobike] RE: issue 34 -- ESP vs. IKE based NAT 
> reboot detection
> 
> Stephane Beaulieu \(stephane\) writes:
> > I would prefer to avoid sending periodic probes (option 3).
> 
> We are sending them anyways if there is no traffic (IKE SA 
> dead peer detection). The difference is that in option 1 
> those probes are only used to detect if the other peer is 
> alive, and in option 3 they also make sure that the other end 
> the correct NAT-T mapping in addition to test that the other 
> peer is alive. The amount and timers for those packets should 
> be same, but Pasi was little bit concerned that some 
> adminstrators might want to configure the timers shorter in 
> case we select option 3 to allow faster recovery of lost NAT 
> mappings. I myself thing that this is such corner case that I 
> do not think anybody will configure the timers shorter 
> because of that.
> 
> The option 3 packets will be few bytes bigger than the option 
> 1 packets, but actually the size difference is lost in the 
> padding (at least for AES cipher). Both of them are small, 
> i.e. about 100 bytes (ip 20 + udp 8 + ike 28 + encr header 4 
> + iv 16 + empty or 8 byte notify plus padding 16 + 12).
> 
> In addition to that IKE SA dead peer detection payloads, 
> there is the normal NAT-T keepalive packets going on, which 
> are again same in both option 1 and 3.
> --
> [email protected]
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.