RE: RE: issue 34 -- ESP vs. IKE based NAT reboot detection

"Stephane Beaulieu (stephane)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID <13E3DA8B48E17D4C96D261A36A23FCD685EDE0@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com>
> reboot detection
> 
> Tero Kivinen wrote:
> 
> >
> >This is the case with alternative 3. I.e. they are not 
> periodic, they 
> >are only sent when the host behind NAT (initiator) detects 
> that it is 
> >not receiving anything (snip)
> >
> True. But I guess you could say that when your device is 
> idle, the probes are being sent and are periodic... how much 
> that matters is a matter of opinion.

I don't understand why this has to be the case.  With DPD, if you have
no packets to send (i.e. you are idle), you don't do DPD.  You only do
DPD if you've sent X number of packets in the last Y seconds, and have
not received any in the same span of time.  The only situation where
this ends up being periodic is when you're sending uni-directional
traffic (which is rare in the real world).

Stephane.


> 
> --Jari
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.