Re: issue 34 proposal

Francis Dupont <[email protected]> Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:28:08 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   This is a suggestion for a potential resolution of issue 34.
   First, it seems that issue 34 is really about two separate
   problems:
   
      Part a: How do we survive NAT reboots? ESP vs. IKE update?
   
   Based on the above I'd like to suggest that we pick
   IKE based messages for NAT reboot/change detection,
   and IKE messages for the path testing. Comments?
   
=> note that I disagree.

Regards

[email protected]