Jari Arkko wrote:
> Is there an IPv6 - IPv4 translation type where the middle
> ground would be useful even for an IPv6 host?
>
> If not, I would suggest leaving the middle ground away
> from v6 but allowing it in v4. ("NAT preventation SHOULD
> be enabled by default in IPv6 if NAT traversal is not enabled.")
>
> If yes, then I think the current text might suffice.
To me it looks like IKEv2 w/tunnel mode IPsec could work through
"Basic-NAT-PT" type v4/v6 translation [RFC2766] (even if the
implementations don't support IKEv2 NAT-T).
(But I haven't gone through all the details.)
Best regards,
Pasi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.