RE: Issue 41: Mandate NAT prevention if not doing NAT-T?

<[email protected]> Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:23:15 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Francis Dupont wrote:

> BTW I agree with the proposed text, my concern is it is 
> incomplete.

Since you seem to be the one person who thinks this is a 
serious problem, perhaps you could also provide some new 
text that better describes the situation?

Best regards,
Pasi

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.