Re: Issue 41: Mandate NAT prevention if not doing NAT-T?

Francis Dupont <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:02:45 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   Are transient traffic redirection attacks serious enough to warrant it?

=> you miss the point: the attack is transient, not the traffic redirection.

[email protected]

PS: to be secure is a property security protocols are looking for.

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.