Re: Issue 41: Mandate NAT prevention if not doing NAT-T?

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   The text that your provided above Francis looks like
   material that could be included in the security
   considerations section. Of course, we'd have to also
   mention that under some conditions, the attack is
   temporary. For instance, if the real node sends packets
   after the attacker has left, the problem is corrected.
   
=> unfortunately this is not true: the problem can be corrected
only with an explicit action (an address update to the right address).

Regards

[email protected]