Re: issue 34 proposal

Francis Dupont <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:55:18 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   If no RR test (with NATD payloads) is done *before* switching, then
   consider me opposed to this solution.
   
=> we are speaking about ESP so I don't understand the "with NATD
payloads" (BTW with NATD payloads only the real source can put a
fake address as they are protected).

   In fact, I'm beginning to think that ESP detection might cause more
   problems than it solves...
   
=> ESP detection is in IKEv2, if you believe it you should have objected
during the IKEv2 last call.

Regards

[email protected]

PS: BTW I believe the ESP detection is the right mechanism for
the implicit update of NAT-T.